[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Notes from BCP convener call
Allan, There is no Board position for or against at the moment. However I do want the Board to be comfortable with with proceeding as I have concerns regarding scope and interactions and overlap with exiting policies, guidelines and practices – especially those ones currently owned by the Board. Specifically, I get nervous around record keeping (voting status, recording decisions) and anything new that TC Admin might have to enforce across all TCs. At the other end of the spectrum are markdowns, github practices etc which do not cause any concerns. If we can get some mutual understanding of boundaries I see no other reasons to stop the TC, even if we start to explore mechanisms other than though a TC. I think the Board and the chair of the Process SC has got a bit stuck in its ways, and could do a better job at engaging with members. Surprisingly I do actively encourage people to raise issues with the formal policies to the Board, such as change and interpretation requests. For the Board Process Committee at least we log all issues received and record their outcome, this is visible in JIRA. Martin. From: Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> Chet - I’m interested in the following statement “o Gershon shares board concerns” Given that Bret is on the board it would seem this viewpoint is not necessarily all of the board. Secondly, I believe comments previously provided by Martin were his and not as a representative of the board. Are you now indicating that the board is providing comments? Unfortunately I was unable to attend the call but from the notes it seems like this TC is doa if the board are now saying they have concerns. I think given that we are all very busy people it seems like the message is received that the board does not want this tc to be created. So what is the boards proposal on how to improve things that the tc were trying to address? Clearly existing mechanisms are ineffective or are unclear to the folks that felt this tc needed to exist. So at a minimum the board has a responsibility to provide guidance on how they see things moving forward and helping lead. From: oasis-charter-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org <oasis-charter-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> - Attending: Bret Jordan (convener), Jane Ginn, Ryan Hohimer, David Filip, Ashok Malhotra, Gershon Janssen, Scott McGrath, Jamie Clark, Chet Ensign (TC Admin) --
Chet Ensign Chief Technical Community Steward
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]