[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Fwd: [office] OpenDocument v1.1/v1.2compatibility
Dave, Dave Pawson wrote: > On 27/10/06, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg > <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote: >> Dave Pawson wrote: >> > I'm trying to work out how this might impact Accessibility. >> > >> > E.g. Rich and his (non) tables. Would we be able to get >> > that through with this rule in place? >> >> Why not? Regardless whether it is a new feature or not, a schema for >> tables in presentations in my point of view is of great advantage for >> ODF users. Therefore, we should add it. > > > > One more from last night's telcon Michael. > > Scenario. > > After 1.2 published. > > > I receive a document. > I need to tell if it is 1.1 or 1.2 > > I don't think there is any information in the xml to say which schema it > is valid to (Or I couldn't find any). I think this is needed for xml > processing. There actually is the version attribute described in section 2.1.2. > Is this true? You need it if you want to validate documents against the schema of a specific version, that's true. You should not need it most other cases. > > If it is added, will your proposal still be valid? Yes, it will. But maybe there is some misunderstanding. My proposal is not a proposal for defining conformance in OpenDocument v1.2 itself. But it is a proposal for guidelines which extensions we should accept for ODF 1.2, and which require a deeper discussion before we know whether we accept them for ODF 1.2. Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]