[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] NY document format study -- Request forPublic Comment
Hi Rob, I see it now, thanks. Peter > > Thanks, Peter. > > This question comes up in Section Q, where they deal with miscellaneous > criticisms of ODF. Not sure why they didn't include it among the other > Section M accessibility questions. > > -Rob > > ----- > > Peter.Korn@Sun.COM wrote on 12/19/2007 06:23:58 PM: > > > Hi Rob, > > > > I'm not seeing that question in the PDF. I see a bunch of questions > > relating to accessibility (section "M", questions 39-43). > > > > It is a valid concern - whether existing AT solutions will work with ODF > > - but it is a concern that has been I believe adequately addressed with > > both IBM's work in IAccessible2 and support of that via JAWS and > > WindowEyes (and "coming soon" support in OOo), and perhaps more > > importantly via the Sun ODF Plugin to MS-Office which means that *all* > > AT that supports MS office (and thus .doc/.xls/.ppt/.docx/...) will > > equally well support ODF. Recall that users of MS-Office 2003 will use > > something very much akin to the Sun plugin for reading .docx files - and > > that is how the majority of AT users will use .docx. Many users will > > find Office 2007 unfamiliar and uncomfortable, and moving to it will > > require an upgrade in their AT (esp. if it is also an upgrade to Vista). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter Korn > > Accessibility Architect, > > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > > > > > Hi ! > > > > > > You may have heard that New York has just recently put out a > Request for > > > Public Comment on "A study concerning electronic record policy for New > > > York State." > > > > > > The list of questions are at the following URL, and the PDF file linked > > > from it: http://www.oft.state.ny.us/oftnews/erecords-study.htm > > > > > > One question (#57 in the PDF) refers to a criticism of ODF (no source > > > given), which is stated as: > > > > > > "Another criticism of ODF has been that many vendors of assistive > > > technology software have not ported their software to ODF-based > > > applications." > > > > > > The questionnaire then whether this is a valid criticism. > > > > > > Any ideas on this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs > in OASIS > > at: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]