[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-accessibility] FW: [office] Validating ODF documents -- Our role in this process?
Thanks to everyone for their responses to this matter. We'll follow the organizational process and use the Wiki accordingly. Regards, Mike Paciello Cell: +1.603.566.7713 > -----Original Message----- > From: Carol Geyer [mailto:carol.geyer@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:28 PM > To: office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [office-accessibility] FW: [office] Validating > ODF documents -- Our role in this process? > > Mary's right. The TC's wiki is meant as a scratch pad for TC > work. The purpose of OpenDocument XML.org is to educate and > engage the wider community. > > We have an "Assistive Technologies" page now in the > OpenDocument XML.org wiki > (http://opendocument.xml.org/assistive-technologies). Anyone > registered for the site is welcome to edit that page, add > links, and add new pages to the wiki. > > An outline of other wiki pages is at > http://opendocument.xml.org/wiki, instructions for posting > are at http://opendocument.xml.org/contribute-content, > and a tag cloud is at http://opendocument.xml.org/categories > > Please let me know you have any specific questions or if I > can help in any way. > > Carol > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:45 PM > To: robert_weir@us.ibm.com; mpaciello@paciellogroup.com; 'Carol Geyer' > Cc: office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [office-accessibility] FW: [office] Validating > ODF documents -- Our role in this process? > > Hi folks, > > > > The TC wiki is intended to be just that - for the use of > the TC members to coordinate on work items. It is not > intended to be something used by the "wider community". > > > > May I suggest that if you have wider community topics they > get posted on the ODF focus area? Carol can help with any > setup issues. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mary > > > > From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:45 PM > To: mpaciello@paciellogroup.com > Cc: office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] FW: [office] Validating > ODF documents -- Our role in this process? > > > > > Indeed. I'd like to see the TC's wiki expand and restructure > a bit. There is stuff that is really only interesting to TC > participants, like action items, etc. But then there is > stuff more widely interesting to the wider community of > ODF users. > > I think as part of that it would be nice to have an > Accessibility page, perhaps with overviews/links to the ODF > 1.1 Accessibility Guidelines document, to the ODF > accessibility proofing tools, to the DAISY converter, etc. > > -Rob > > > > > "Mike Paciello" <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com> > > 05/05/2008 01:23 PM > > Please respond to > <mpaciello@paciellogroup.com> > > To > > <office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org> > > cc > > > Subject > > [office-accessibility] FW: [office] Validating ODF documents > -- Our role in this process? > > > > > > > > > Can we complement the contents of this starter doc with > accessibility notations/recommendations? Resources? Tools? > > - Mike > > > Mike Paciello > Cell: +1.603.566.7713 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Zander [mailto:zander@kde.org <mailto:zander@kde.org> ] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 11:48 AM > To: office@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office] Validating ODF documents > > On Friday 2. May 2008 21:40:13 robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > > Prompted by some confusion out there, which you may have > read about, > > I've put together a guide to "How to Validate an ODF > document". The > > draft is up on our wiki here: > > > > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/How_to_Validate_an_ODF_document > <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/How_to_Validate_an_ODF_document> > > > > Please contribute any additions or corrections to improve this. In > > particular, it would be good to have a list of common errors and > > workarounds for validation engines other than jing. > > > > The idea is this: if we post the error message and the > workaround on > > our wiki, then a developer running into this problem and querying > > Google, will be likely to find a solution to their problem here. > > I don't have a login for that wiki, but these links may be > useful; http://www.koffice.org/developer/fileformat/validate.php > <http://www.koffice.org/developer/fileformat/validate.php> > > http://wiki.koffice.org/index.php?title=KOffice_and_ODF#Validation > <http://wiki.koffice.org/index.php?title=KOffice_and_ODF#Validation> > > feel free to copy anything you want. > -- > Thomas Zander > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS > TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group > and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > <https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workg roups.php> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS > TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group > and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr oups.php > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]