[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] 8.5.4 of ODF 1.0 - update
Rob, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > In fact, this list should be used purely for public comment submissions on > the ODF standard. It is not intended to be a discussion list. > > The ODF TC hosts another list for that can be used for more general > ODF-related discussions, opendocument-users, which can be subscribed to > from here: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > > Just to clarify, err, we can discuss the comments that are submitted on this list, Yes? That is I can ask for clarification, perhaps make suggestions, etc. I assume you mean that discussions of the substance of the comment, that is what the TC should or should not do, etc., should be on the TC list? I know hard and fast distinctions are probably not possible but just wanted to be as clear as we can be about the use of this list. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > Regards, > > -Rob > > ------------------- > > "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 07/07/2008 > 12:39:11 PM: > > >> On looking over my own words, I propose the following amendments: >> >> 1. It's not like you can argue with someone about what their personal >> opinion is. **One might ask about the basis for such an opinion, but I >> think that particular conversation would be off-topic here.** I could >> > argue > >> with the veracity of the **rejoinder's** particular quoted statements >> > and > >> ... >> >> 2. And added to the PS: In any case, I think the appropriate attention >> > here > >> is on the review and improvement of ODF, not allegations about other >> specifications. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00065.html >> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] >> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 09:11 >> To: 'ODF Comments List' >> Cc: 'MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)'; 'Sheldon Britton' >> Subject: RE: [office-comment] 8.5.4 of ODF 1.0 >> >> [ ... ] >> >> When someone gives their personal opinion about something (as MURATA >> > did), I > >> don't think it is appropriate to drag in appeals to authorities. It's >> > not > >> like you can argue with someone about what their personal opinion is. I >> could argue with the veracity of the particular quoted statements and >> > the > >> non sequitur based on them, but I think that would be seriously >> > off-topic. > >> [ ... ] >> >> - Dennis >> >> PS: To be clear, I have no opinion whatsoever on the comparison that >> > MURATA > >> made, and I certainly can claim no perspective on the relative >> translatability of the two specifications to another language. I would >> > have > >> simply passed over that comparison but for it having attracted lightning >> here. >> >> >> >> -- >> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the >> OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC. >> >> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and >> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required >> before posting. >> >> Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >> Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >> List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org >> List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ >> Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf >> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php >> Committee: >> > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office > > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]