[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Mandatory parts of an ODF-package
Hi Rob, I appologize for that - I was not aware of the "feedback-only"-detail. I will try the ODF fellowship mail list you suggested. Thanks, /Jesper Lund Stocholm www.idippedut.dk 2008/8/5 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> > Discussions belong on the "opendocument-users" lists, not the > "office-comment" list. The office-comment list is only for public > feedback on the ODF standard and drafts. The Fellowship also has a > discussion list. Perhaps they can explain why their validator requires > styles.xml, etc. You can join it here: > http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss > > But as an aside, if you are experimenting, don't forget that you can > ignore packaging altogether and have a single XML file with > <office:document> as the root element. That gives you the simplest > possible "hello world" document. > > -Rob > > "Jesper Lund Stocholm" <4a4553504552@gmail.com> wrote on 08/05/2008 > 04:00:45 AM: > > > > 08/05/2008 04:05 AM > > > > I am trying to figure out what the mandatory parts of an ODF-package are > - > > but I can't seem to find a clear answer. If I read ODF 1.0 (section 2.1 > > about document roots and section 17 about the package) I would conclude > > this: > > > > Required parts of an ODF-package is the following streams in the > > ZIP-archive: > > > > content.xml > > META-INF/manifest.xml > > > > (actually the content.xml-stream is required only by reference > (induction?) > > since it contains the document data itself and the stream containing the > > document must be named "content.xml". I would argue though, that given > > strict reading of the spec a document would be conformant when omitting > the > > content.xml-stream as well). > > > > The problem with the above is that it goes against the output of the > > OpenDocumentFellowship-validator (it requires the styles.xml, > settings.xml > > and meta.xml-files and mimetype-file) as well as the current > implementation > > of all application suites supporting ODF. > > > > Can you (anyone) confirm the above? It seems to me that a KISS/simple > > "Hello-world"-ODF document would be perfectly valid if it only contained > the > > content.xml-file as well as the manifest-file. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > /Jesper Lund Stocholm > > www.idippedut.dk > > > -- > This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the > OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC. > > In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and > to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required > before posting. > > Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org > List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ > Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > Committee: > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]