[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Requirement
> "Leonard Mada" <discoleo@gmx.net> wrote on 03/13/2009 09:28:40 AM: >> I strongly support to extend ODF with features derived from > web-technologies. >> >> ODF is currently not on-par with these technologies. >> >> See also some of my previous OOo feature requests: >> [which are well also ODF-limitations] >> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79882 >> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66169 >> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79866 >> > > Hi Leonard, the ODF TC is unable to consider material that is merely > linked to a comment. IPR rules and all that stuff. So if you have not > previously sent the substance of these three OOo feature requests to the > office-comment list, please consider doing so. +1 Leonard, you should resubmit those reports as requests, using the request template provided. Try to be specific in the solution you favour. These are requests for features in the version of ODF after the feature-fixed current draft. http://opendocument.xml.org/news/oasis-welcomes-input-for-odf-next Of course, if they are implementation bugs, ODF is not the correct place for them. (Though, of course, if the implementation bug is caused by an interpretation difference, then it is a standards issue, and one that should be submitted for the current and draft versions of ODF!) Cheers Rick Jelliffe
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]