[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] query / comment on XOR() - let's change XOR
Hi David, On Tuesday, 2007-02-13 13:31:07 -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote: > I agree with Brad Hards and Eike, we should change the definition of XOR. And my thanks to Brad Hards for telling us this!! > > Eike, will you do that please? You may as well change {Logical L}* to {Logical L}+, > and fix the extraneous yellow line. Will do. > I've looked around, and all sources agree with Brad. I compared with Kspread 1.4.2, also there =XOR(1;1;1) yields TRUE. I assume some confusion arose from discussions like in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Exclusive_or#More_than_2_operands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XOR_gate#More_than_two_inputs Now I just wonder why something was defined that none of the applications implement.. Eike -- Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements of spreadsheets. --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]