Re: [office-metadata] RDFa model and xml:id

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

John,

John Madden wrote:

> I've looked at the odf 1.x schemas. It's a little bit of a challenge  
> to add attributes because the schema doesn't define a <common- 
> attribs> kind of pattern that is **universal** for every single  
> attribute in the schema, -----it only defines some 'families' of  
> <common-attribs>- type patterns.
>
> But that should be relatively straightforward to change.
>
> BTW, as a general comment, it would be great if the odf.rng were a  
> bit more modular. That's one GIANT schema!! How about breaking it  
> down with a master schema and some includes ? My xml editor chokes!!!
>
Wouldn't your xml editor choke if we used includes?

Try opening the OOXML Primer or Reference document with validation on if 
you want a slow thrill. ;-)

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

> John
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2006, at 1039, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Elias Torres wrote:
>>
>>> On another note, I'm trying to understand the actual problems we  
>>> might have
>>> with RDFa so I can try to address them. Is it a problem to add a  
>>> handful of
>>> attributes to the current ODF schemas? I'd think that if we can  
>>> xml:id, it
>>> shouldn't be a problem adding a few more.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to flag this as an explicit agenda item for today, along  
>> with copy-and-paste issue we were discussing with the citation case.
>>
>> Talk to you all soon.
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Patrick@Durusau.net
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!