[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Metadata text fields
Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: > > ... > >>>> This plug-in has furthermore the responsibility to keep the literal >>>> consistent with further metadata in the document (e.g. RDF/XML). >>> >>> This is where the confusion keeps coming in. There's no need to be >>> "consistent" here because the in-content text *is* the literal. >>> There's nothing to be consistent with. >> Unfortunately there is no guarantee that the RDF statement - where >> the literal is part as the RDF object - is unique in-content only. >> Aside of an usage in RDF/XML, there might be even the same in-content >> RDF statement a couple of times in the document. I would >> optimistically assume that if you change one, you change them all. > > I see what you mean now. > > Here's the thing: we cannot worry about this. > > Consider this example: > > <span about="urn:uuid:2387832787283" property="ex:tag">foo</span> > <span about="urn:uuid:2387832787283" property="ex:tag">bar</span> > > Are these "inconsistent"? Answer: only if we assume there can be only > one ex:tag property for a resource. > > So in essence, the answer is no, they aren't: they are two separate > statements. > > ... Exactly, it depends on the vocabulary being used. Therefore the only one, who the grammar knows and might keep consistency correctly is the RDF application (plug-in). > >>> ... have one new field whose job it is to display information about >>> *resources*. >>> >>> I want to say in my document that Patrick is the author, but I have >>> Patrick vCard record already in RDF/XML in the package, so I do >>> something like: >>> >>> <meta:field >>> meta:about="urn:uuid:8134713815475740574" <!-- document URI --> >>> meta:property="dc:creator" >>> meta:resource="http://ex.net/people#patrick">Patrick >>> Durusau</mta:field> >> Can you give me the RDF triples you are telling here and do you refer >> to the RDF/XML spec when you talk about a resource? Any link? >> Would not be one triple sufficient for the beginning? > > Triple is: > > <urn:uuid:813471381547574057> dc:creator <http://ex.net/people#patrick> . > Thanks. Isn't there a further RDF statement about the relation of the string 'Patrick Durusau' and some of the RDF IRIs? Regards, Svante
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]