Re: [office-metadata] "Logical/abstract" vs. "physical" representation

[Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> 
> On Mar 5, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - 
> Hamburg wrote:
> 
>> I think the assumption was that all relative URIs are made absolute 
>> when  creating the RDF model, so you will have absolute URIs in the 
>> RDF model only. You further always have the option to use absolute 
>> URIs in RDF-XML stream. Whether an absolute IRI in the model is saved 
>> as a relative IRI is something that should be under control of the 
>> plug-ins. We should not make any assumption about that.
> 
> Clearly in general we should strongly encourage absolute URIs, but the 
> issue is, how do you convert an xml:id in an ODF document to a full URI?

I may have misunderstood something, but my understanding is that the 
node you want to make a statement about (or about its content) gets an 
id, and that you have an rdf:about attribute that references this node. 
If the node has the ID "id42", the rdf:about attribute's would be 
"content.xml#id42", and you would turn it into an absolute IRI using the 
rules from the existing proposal.


Michael
> 
> The issue is resolution of ODF nodes in essence.
> 
> Bruce
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS