[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] clarifying fields and metadata
>>>> But we're missing something which is really a sort of hybrid >>>> situation: in content metadata which may be field-like. From one of >>>> our (medical) use cases: >>>> <meta:label >>>> meta:about="http://ex.net/contacts/1" >>>> meta:property="http://medical.org/patient" >>>> meta:resource="http://ex.net/contacts/2">Jane Doe</meta:label> >>>> This would generate a triple of course: >>>> <http://ex.net/contacts/1> <http://medical.org/patient> >>>> <http://ex.net/contacts/2> . >>>> So my question is really how we define #2 formally in ODF? To me it seems as we are trying to add two RDF statements in one text:meta-label (= the new attribute name is fine for me). I assume that "Jane Doe" is the patient, who is described as "http://ex.net/contacts/2". Why not say the following: <text:meta-label meta:about="http://ex.net/contacts/2" meta:property="ex:salutation">Dear Jane Doe</text:meta-label> and moving the triple <http://ex.net/contacts/1> <http://medical.org/patient> <http://ex.net/contacts/2> . into RDF/XML? IMHO by giving the label a RDF predicate describing the label the need of the meta:resource is no longer given and the usage of less attributes makes it easier for the user. Svante
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]