Re: [office-metadata] citation

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

Bruce,

Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> ...
> Then I suggest we look to include the generic classes and properties I 
> posted in the main metadata proposal.
>
> To repeat, we need a generic Field class that people can subclass. So 
> something like:
Is the generic field you mentioned only for describing our 
text:meta-field element?
In general any further prerequisites regarding citation would be 
helpful, any information on scenarios / requirements you would like to 
cover.
Remember I still need to know more about citation, esp. understand what 
you like to cover.
>
> field:Field a owl:Class ;
>     rdfs:label "Field"@en ;
>     rdfs:comment "A generic document field."@en .
>
> field:Reference a owl:Class ;
>     rdfs:label "Reference"@en ;
>     rdfs:comment "A reference to an object."@en ;
>     rdfs:subClassOf odf:Field .
What is the difference between field:Field and odf:Field?
>
> We then need the following properties:
>
> field:prefix a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>     rdfs:domain odf:Field ;
>     rdfs:range rdfs:Literal ;
>     rdfs:label "prefix"@en;
>     rdfs:comment "A field prefix."@en .
>
> field:suffix a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>     rdfs:domain odf:Field ;
>     rdfs:range rdfs:Literal ;
>     rdfs:label "suffix"@en;
>     rdfs:comment "A field suffix."@en .
>
> field:sequence a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
>     rdfs:domain field:Field ;
>     rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
>     rdfs:label "sequence"@en;
>     rdfs:comment "An index position within an ordered sequence."@en .
>
> With those general structures in place, it's easy for me to build the 
> citation stuff on top of that.
Bests,
Svante