[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Propsal regarding the use of the SVG namespace in OpenDocument
Hi Vincent, below is a proposal how the SVG WG and the OpenDocument TC could resolve the issue regarding the SVG namespace in the case that the SVG WG comes to the conclusion that they consider the way we are using the SVG namespace to be invalid. Please note that this proposal is my personal proposal and has neither been discussed nor agreed by the OpenDocument TC so far. Can you please forward this proposal to the SVG WG. Thanks. The proposal consist of the following items: 1. The OpenDocument TC move the SVG attributes into a namespace of its own, for instance "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns: svg-compatible:1.0" 2. The SVG WG specifies a namespace that is reserved for elements and attributes in a global scope, i.e. namespaced elements and attributes that are used in the way the OpenDocument specification uses them. I here assume that this namespace is called "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary", but of course it is up to the SVG WG to define a proper name. An option would be decide that global element and attribute definition would be contained in the already existing "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" namespace, but again, this is something that the SVG WG has to decide based on their requirements. To avoid delays in OpenDocument schedule, the decision about this namepace is required within the next few days. 3. The SVG WG defines the elements and attributes of the "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary" namespace not immediately, but in a timeframe that is considered to be appropriate by the working group. This full step is optional. 4. The OpenDocument TC adds to its specification, that implementations that support the "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns: svg-compatible:1.0" namespace also may/should/must support the "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary" namespace, and further may/should/must process elements and attributes from the "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary" namespace in the same way as elements and attribues from the "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns: svg-compatible:1.0" namespace that have the same local name. 5. The OpenDocument TC in future specification moves elements and attributes from the "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns: svg-compatible:1.0" to the "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary" namespace, if, and only if, definitions in the "http://www.w3.org/2005/svg-vocabulary" exist and are the same as in the OpenDocument specification. By using this process, the SVG WG can extend its specification without having to care about OpenDocument in any way, and the OpenDocument specification can take over the definitions from SVG without getting incompatible. Of course, the fact that our two groups can work independent of each other, does not mean that a collaboration between our two working groups isn't reasonable. Best regards Michael
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]