OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office] Meta Data Requirments Sub Committee

On Feb 23, 2006, at 2:50 PM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:

> An open question:  Do we want to take any action on the deliverables 1 
> and 2 above?  For example, before proceeding to deliverable 3, we 
> might want to discuss and approve the use cases and requirements, to 
> make sure we are all in agreement on what is "in scope" and "out of 
> scope".  Further, we might want to gather public comment on the 
> metadata usecases and requirements.  Would it make sense to issue that 
> document (use cases and requirements) as a Committee Draft for that 
> purpose?  

Yeah, I think both make sense. I was assuming that intermediate step, 
but is should be in the charter. There's not much point bothering with 
proposed specifications if we can't agree on the scope.

And yes, I think it makes sense to make a combined use case and 
requirements document available for public comment.

One minor question, though: would the TC first discuss and tentatively 
approve the use case/requirements and then it would be available for 
public comment, before some final decision based on them?  Or would the 
TC only consider the document after the public comment period?


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]