[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ODF 1.0 Second Edition Committee Specification Vote
The public review for OpenDocument 1.0 2nd Edition has ended. I have taken another look at what comments have been received during the public review of OpenDocument 1.0 second edition. There is one dated 3 Jun 2006 which was explicitly mentioned by Jamie Clarke at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200606/msg00000.html This concerns the capitalization of some style names used in OpenOffice.org. Those style names are not part of the specification. I will thus direct the poster to OpenOffice.org for further assitence. This has no relevance to 1.0 2nd ed. in my opinion. Another comment dated 19 Jun 2006 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200606/msg00013.html This is again a comment on how styles are handled in a specific implementation and nothing we need to address for 1.0 2nd ed. All the other comments we received were already addressed in the draft that was up for public review. Hence I would like to ask the OASIS staff to start the electronic ballot though which the TC can vote to accept the documents referenced in the public review announcement [1] as a Committee Specification. Best Regards Lars Oppermann [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200606/msg00004.html -- Lars Oppermann <lars.oppermann@sun.com> Sun Microsystems Software Engineer - StarOffice Sachsenfeld 4 Phone: +49 40 23646 959 D-20097 Hamburg Fax: +49 40 23646 550 http://www.sun.com/staroffice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]