[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] id or xml:id attribute?
On 10/11/06, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > > > I think 1.2 would be a good chance to decide if we mean xml:id > > or just another attribute. > > > > I don't think this would meet your example Bruce? > > What's the referent of "this" Dave? Your use of id='1' which is invalid DTD wise, I'm far less certain in xml schema and relax. > > My understanding of xml:id is that it does indeed fullfill the need > to identify and reference document fragments, in a general and > consistent way. > > But in any case, we need it to be able to support one of our use > cases, which I think implies at minimum that ids must be unique > across all the namespaces. > > Might be good to consider adding xml:id in the future though. Yes, and not too far in the future! It seems silly to be using 4 or 5 namespaces? Uniqueness is a separable issue (especially if the user is generating id values. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]