Re: [office] style:list-style-name and list-id

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

Sure. I think the sample
<text:numbered-paragraph="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:p>Text</text:p>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id1" style:name="L1"><text:p>H2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:p>Text</text:p>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP1</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP2</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP3</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id2" style:name="L1"><text:p>NP4</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:p>Text</text:p>
<text:numbered-paragraph="id1" style:name="L2"><text:p>Appendix</text:p><text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:p>Text</text:p>
is valid according your list-id idea. Right?

So my question really is what is the corresponding text:list definition?


~Florian


>>> Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> 03/13/07 11:43 AM >>>
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 11:33, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Talking about technical stuff. What I posted as "my critical problem" is
> really critical to me. Would you please tell me your opinion about it?

Is this assuming the list-id proposal will be accepted?
-- 
Thomas Zander