Re: [office] table:filter-condition extension proposal

[Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>]

On Wednesday 13 June 2007 13:07:27 Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Making the value an attribute will, IMHO, make it consistent with the
> > current filter-condition semantics, although in practice it would not
> > matter too much one way or the other.
> >
> > What do others think of this?
>
> I'm completely unbiased. Thinking that a bit further though: do we need
> a <filter-set-item> element at all? Wouldn't a table:set-item attribute
> do as well? As in
>
>     <filter-condition table:field-number=1 table:operator="="
>     table:value="John Doe" table:set-item="John Doe"
>     table:set-item="Jane Doe"/>
>
> I may be completely wrong on this of course.

AFAIK this is not possible, you can't have more than one attribute of the 
same name.
-- 
Thomas Zander

PGP signature