[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] table:filter-condition extension proposal
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 16:56:40 Kohei Yoshida wrote: > The original motivation for proposing this format: > > <filter-set-item table:value="John Doe"/> > > instead of the other format: > > <filter-set-item>John Doe</filter-set-item> > > is to make it in line with the 'table:value' attribute of the current > table:filter-condition element, which is formatted like this: > > <filter-condition table:field-number=1 table:operator="=" > table:value="Doe"/> I understand the logic, but I am under the impression that the moving of the attribute to become a node will make the suggestion of mine to be very common and obvious. In other words; if its all the same to you, I think we should go for the <filter-set-item>John Doe</filter-set-item> form. ps. I'm totally uninformed about the actual feature you are extending. So it would be great to get someone else to comment on that. -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]