Re: [office] which xsl do we reference?

[Michael Brauer <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

We reference XSL 1.0 because XSL 1.1 was not finished when we prepared 
ODF 1.1. For ODF 1.2 we may of cause switch to XSL 1.1 of this does not 
have any side effects.

Michael

Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 12/06/07, Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately in http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/ dated December 2006
> 
> Officially 1.1
> 
> the section
>> we want to reference is §7.16.9
>> Seems a new second level section has been inserted in the new version.
>>
>> Might be useful for someone to go through the ODF spec and fix all
>> references to the new XLS spec, or we should decide we will not link to
>> the latest one. (not my favorite)
> 
> 1.1 clears up all the bugs in 1.0 and adds very little. Certainly nothing
> in terms of terminology.
> 
> I'd favour referencing to the latest.
> 
> regards
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
        D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Marcel Schneider, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering