[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] xml:lang settings. Confused.
On 20/06/07, Michael Brauer <Michael.Brauer@sun.com> wrote: > > Why can't the xml:lang be used throughout? > > For clarity where does 'western' finish and (presumably ) Eastern start? > > xml:lang is so much simpler. > > ODF has an style:script-type attribute that (optionally) provides hints > where the script types start and end. It's defined in section 15.4.21. My question related to the weak definition Michael. Western and Eastern isn't precise for a specification. > How to get this on the agenda for 1.2? > >> > >> I'd like to hear what the decision was to have this Western/CJK/CTL > >> approach in ODF. To me it seems it originated in some behavior of that > >> MS-Word text processor. > > > > Oh dear. That doesn't sound good. > > Well, to the best of my knowledge MS Word also has different attributes > for Western, CJK and CTL text. I do wish we could avoid making the same mistakes as Word. > > But the different attributes for the language, and also for other > attributes like the font family, do exist for usability reasons. Can we just discuss xml:lang please, fonts may be associated but should be a seperable problem. If you > write a mixed text, you probably don't want to assign the language to > every piece of text that does not have the default language. That doesn't make sense to me. From a visual perspective, I can continue writing, say, my English, and use some subset of French, and no one will know. If I change to use Katakana then I'd hope the author would indicate the fact! So yes, to be correct, I would want the author to assign a language to the block of text in question. In > particular, since you in practice do not only have to assign the > language, but in many situations also the font family, and sometimes > even the font height and weight. That makes sense, unless you have some very clever implementations. I want a tool that can recognise the code points, match them with glyphsets and find an appropriate font. Font size/weight is orthoganal to this aspect. For that reason, ODF has different > attribute sets for these attribute, so that the user can set them once > in the style, and from than on does not have to care about them any longer. Do you think that is satisfactory Michael? I don't. Regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]