OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [office] Digital Signature proposal

2008/7/31 Ming Fei Jia <jiamingf@cn.ibm.com>:
> Thanks explanation although that can not convince me completely. You said
> "...if the application developer choose to only support XMLDsig, it will
> still being compliant with ODF 1.2...". Is that true? XMLDsig and XAdES are
> as different options in the proposal. If the application only implements
> XMLDsig, could the application claim to be compliant with ODF standard? I
> think at most it can claim partial compliant. This is the conformance issue.
> Another is the interoperability issue. Assume one application only
> implements XMLDsig, another application only implements XAdES. How does the
> first application validate the signed document with XAdES format generated
> by the second application? Seems no way,even both the two applications claim
> to be compliant with the same ODF standard.

A conformance issue for ODF?
Seems the TC has to choose one or the other if interoperability is
to work for signed documents.


Dave Pawson

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]