[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: #6.8 - Errata Review
Dennis, Thanks! I will be checking these this week as well. I don't know why I would be off consistently on the ISO 26300 numbers but agree that they need to be proofed, again. Hope you are at the start of a great week! Patrick Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Patrick, > > I had mentioned that I thought it was worth double-checking all of the > references to ODF 1.0 and to IS 26300 (the ed.2cs1 version) to make sure > there were no further inaccuracies beyond those already reported. > > I have done that. Here are corrections. Some are not off by much. I would > like these double-checked. For ODF 1.0 I am using OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf > created 2005-05-11:09:44:45. For IS 26300, I am using > OpenDocument-v1.0ed2-cs1.pdf created 2006-07-21-17:46:59. Every line in a > table caption is counted. > > ODF 1.0 IS 26300 > Section page line page line > > 6.7.5 141 18 141 *34* > > 6.7.5 141 22 141 *38* > > 9.3.3 300 13 304 *7* > > 9.3.3 301 *2* 304 *38* > > 9.3.10 307 39 311 *32* > > 9.3.10 307 40 311 *33* > > *9.5.3* *330* *27* *334* *29* [under "T" *** missed ***, same as B and V] > 9.5.3 330 35 334 37 [under "B" - correct] > 9.5.3 330 39 334 *41* [under "V"] > > 9.9 356 11 360 *35* > > 11.7.3 432 22 438 *16* > > 12.4 438 37 445 3 > Better instruction is: Replace "section ." with "section 9.9." > > 15.4.19 561 *12* 570 *38* > [there are numbered blank lines in the schema] > > 15.5.29 589 *23* 599 *43* > [ditto] > > 15.5.38 592 25 602 *44* > [and ditto] > > 15.10.1 605 5 615 *38* > > 15.11.11 609 17 620 11 > [watch Section column width in errata here down through 15.27.31] > > 15.27.31 655 12 *667* 10 > 15.27.31 655 18 *667* 16 > > 15.28.4 656 *32* 668 *31* > > 15.30.9 661 46 674 *13* > > 15.31.3 663 20 675 *36* > 15.31.3 663 21 675 *37* > 15.31.3 663 34 676 5 > *15.31.3* 663 *37* 676 *8* [same instruction as previous item] > > 15.36.10 675 6 687 36 [watch Section column width] > > 16.1 679 29 *692**29* > > 17.5 686 18 n/a [already done in IS 26300] > [other agreed changes may cause line references to move] > > 17.7.3 688 38 701 35 [really needs a [media-types] reference] > > Appendix 695 8 708 9 [watch Section column width] > B > > > I wasn't expecting to find so many. > > - Dennis > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00014.html > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:25 > To: office@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [office] #6.7 Errata comments - typo, grammar, and miscellaneous > glitches > > Re: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00059.html > > [ ... ] > > - #6.7c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > [ ... ] > > [I have not systematically checked the page references between ODF 1.0 and > IS 26300. I caught this one because it was obviously strange. I have this > nagging suspicion that I should run through the entire list and verify all > of the pairs of citations.] > > [ ... ] > > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]