[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review
Patrick, there are many errata items where the page and line references are correct for both documents. When I did my original errata review, I worked mainly from the ODF 1.0 OASIS Standard (-os.pdf) and I checked the ed.2-cs1 only when inspection showed an unusual difference or the erratum had problems. If I saw no problem with the erratum in the OASIS Standard, I often looked no further. (I had procrastinated and I wanted to make the Friday deadline.) Because I found a few page-and-line deviations in the first review, I decided to check them all now. That's how I found my additional list of suspects (plus some additional items that I noticed while inspecting for line numbers). - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00025.html Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 03:57 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review Dennis, Thanks! I will be checking these this week as well. I don't know why I would be off consistently on the ISO 26300 numbers but agree that they need to be proofed, again. Hope you are at the start of a great week! Patrick Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00024.html [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]