OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review

Patrick, there are many errata items where the page and line references are
correct for both documents.  When I did my original errata review, I worked
mainly from the ODF 1.0 OASIS Standard (-os.pdf) and I checked the ed.2-cs1
only when inspection showed an unusual difference or the erratum had
problems.  If I saw no problem with the erratum in the OASIS Standard, I
often looked no further.  (I had procrastinated and I wanted to make the
Friday deadline.)

Because I found a few page-and-line deviations in the first review, I
decided to check them all now.  That's how I found my additional list of
suspects (plus some additional items that I noticed while inspecting for
line numbers).

 - Dennis   

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] 
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 03:57
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review



I will be checking these this week as well.

I don't know why I would be off consistently on the ISO 26300 numbers 
but agree that they need to be proofed, again.

Hope you are at the start of a great week!


Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]