[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Errata: Substantive Schema Change in 15.27.22?
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:52 -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > 6) If any TC member knows of an ODF 1.0 implementation that would require > modification in order to remain compliant with the proposed schema change, > then they should speak up and say so. We can always take this change out. > But, for example, if implementations generally do not implement this > attribute, or if they silently have already made the spelling correction > in their implementations, then this may not be a problem. By having > review on the TC as well as a 15-day public review, we give any > implementation, whether represented on the TC or not, a fair opportunity > to make this point. What about ODF 1.0 implementations that do not exist yet? Is it understood that any new ODF 1.0 implementation will have no follow the errata? Andreas -- Andreas J. Guelzow <email@example.com> Andreas J. Guelzow