[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Coordination Call Attendance
I apologize for being thick about this. The information I asked for was always available in other activities known to me, and I assumed that it would be valuable as part of our accountability for the work (providing simple demonstration for what the numbers are based on, in particular). It is missing for me. I now understand it is not the practice and would be burdensome. I also apologize for not realizing what all the additional tools are and how they are used by TC officers. I use the resources that were available to me as a non-TC member because that is what I already knew to use. I will not pursue this further. - Dennis PS: I think of the public record as the material that is perpetually available without being a member of OASIS or the TC. -----Original Message----- From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00002.html Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 01:03 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: 'OpenDocument Mailing List'; robert_weir@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [office] Coordination Call Attendance Hi Dennis, On 09/30/08 18:07, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00121.html [ ... ] But I would like to understand why this is important to you? I have never required that information, even not in my role as TC co-chair. What I need is the information who right now is a member and has voting rights. But this information is available at the TC membership page. We furthermore track already the number of voting members the TC has in total and the number of those that are attending. Why is it important to you to also have the names of voting members that are not attending to a call in the minutes? > > I looked at the Calendar tool, but it doesn't provide any more information > than the minutes with regard to this question. I don't think it is part of > the OASIS public record, either. I may be wrong, but my understanding is that it is part of the public record. At least, the data in the tool is used to conduct electronic ballots. > > Also, the complete membership roster is difficult to use (being organized by > organization rather than individual). For those reasons, I am requesting That's true for the public roster. The roster at the TC member page http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/members/roster.php can be sorted by the last name or status by clicking the corresponding heading. Maybe that's what you are looking for. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]