Re: In response on ODF and XAdES signatures (2)

["Bob Jolliffe" <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>]

Thank you Mr Cruellas for giving your attention to this request and
also for raising it within the ETSI committee.  Jomar Silva and myself
will refine the XML digital signature proposal In response to the
comments we have received back from the OASIS DSS-X TC and the ETSI
Committee and take the proposal forward.  We will certainly appreciate
your input on this amended proposal.

Regards
Bob Jolliffe


2008/10/8 Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>:
> Dear Mr Jolliffe,
>
>
> I am writing on behalf of the OASIS DSS-X TC in response to your email
> of 14th August 2008.
>
> First of all, the DSS-X TC wants to thank you for the submission of the
> aforementioned email.
>
>  From the review of the specific questions that you include in your
> email, it is the opinion of this TC that questions #1, #2, #3 and #5
> actually are more related to the XAdES standard itself than to the DSS
> profile for managing generation and verification of XAdES sigantures
> produced by this committee. It is the opinion of this TC that ETSI
> Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI) Committee is the
> suitable body to answer them.
>
> As for question #4, as you notice, DSS produced and DSS-X is producing a
> number of profiles for matching the DSS core standard to specific
> environments or to incorporate new features. The DSS set of standards
> also allow to combine different profiles incorporating additional
> features for obtaining more powerfullness.
>
> This approach allows to incorporate in the core a set of basic yet
> relevant features, and still allowing that those systems requiring
> additional ones may make use of the profiles.
>
>
> On behalf of the DSS-X TC I would like to thank you again for approaching
> us. Please feel free to contact us again if you consider it worth in the
> future.
>
> With best regards
>
> Juan Carlos Cruellas on behalf of the DSS-X TC
>