Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Dave,

Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2009/2/23 Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>:
>   
>> Dave,
>>
>> Now, now. Let's not be hasty.
>>     
>
> Hardly hasty Patrick.
>
> I reviewed almost 50% of the 1.1 standard looking hard for hard
> 'requirements' which
> were verifiable for a clear conformance statement.
>
> There are very few.
>
> So my position is certainly not written in haste.
>
>   
I didn't mean to imply that your review or the technical basis for your 
substantive comments were hasty.

I did mean to imply that comments about others were "hasty."

We are all equally concerned with moving beyond the text of ODF 1.1.

Substantive comments about the current (or prior version where relevant) 
draft are always welcome.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

>
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)