[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Comments on draft response
Dennis, On 10.08.09 21:30, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Here are some problems that I notice with this approach. > > > 2.2 Along with this, the JP-35 response refers to language (and section > titles) in IS 26300 that are not the language (or referenced IETF RFCs) in Regarding the different language: The wording of the two paragraphs in 17.5 we are talking about differs between the OASIS ODF 1.0 standard, and the OASIS ODF 1.0 2nd edition, which is the same as ISO 26300. The current draft lists the wording of the 2nd edition/ISO 26300. If that is the concern, we can a) omit the original language, and just refer to "the first paragraph behind the list in section 17.5", etc. b) include the text from the OASIS standard, with a note how this reads in the 2nd edition. Both suggestion should resolve that issue. Regarding the different RFCs: The OASIS standard contains a reference to §5 of RFC2396. The 2nd edition/ISO 26300 contains a reference to RFC3987, which turned out to be problematic. We are now resolving that by a dual reference to RFC3986 (which is the successor of RFC2396) and RFC3987. Why do you think this is an issue, in particular, since we are not referencing RFC3986 in general, but a specific definition in a section? > the OASIS Standard for ODF 1.0. This is no closer to resolving this one > than when the same defect was deferred in Errata 01. I disagree on that. I think the issues are technically resolved, and the editorial issue how to handle the situation that the text between ODF 1.0 and ODF 1.0 2nd edition differs should be resolvable as well. > I recommend that we continue to defer this item until we figure out what I disagree on that as well. We have deferred this in the first errata although we had a proposal how to resolve this. I don't want to defer this one more time. > we really want in the ODF 1.2 counterpart and then see how to reflect that > in any future errata. The current draft for ODF 1.2 already contains a rewrite of this section. However, that goes in my opinion beyond what I would like to change in an errata document. Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]