[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2059) Resolve potentialambiguity with optionality in leading "=" and "=="
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16321#action_16321 ]
Michael Brauer commented on OFFICE-2059:
----------------------------------------
Some comments regarding this issue are also here.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200909/msg00258.html
In my opinion, the full namespace prefix question belongs in part 1, and only in part 1. Part 2 should only define expressions. How they are referenced or declared to be of type "OpenFormula" is an issue of the hosting language, that is part 1.
Actually, with the resolution of OFFICE-2034 we have everything we need regarding the namespace handling in part 1. Section 1.3 Namespace and 5.1 Namespace selection may (or should?) be removed from the formula specification. The same applies with the references to "namespace selection" in 2.1.1 small group and 3.6 Basic Limits.
The other question is regarding the preceding "= ForceRecalc?". In my opinion, this is also matter of the hosting language (and therefore of part 1) rather than of part 2.
> Resolve potential ambiguity with optionality in leading "=" and "=="
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-2059
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2059
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: OpenFormula, Table
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
> Environment: This comment applies to the current working draft of open formula
> Reporter: Dennis Hamilton
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: ODF 1.2
>
>
> Between statements in ODF 1.2 Part 1 where OpenFormula formulae may be hosted, and the description of the use of optional namespace prefix, leading "=", and the extra leading "==" for recalculation control, I am concerned that this situation has unresolvable ambiguities.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]