[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-comment] OASIS Public Review Question
Damn, address auto-completion. Yes, I meant this for the TC list. In any case, Mary did respond to me, saying that it was possible, and that if the TC approved a motion to extend the review period of x days, she would send out an announcement to that effect. So I think that may be the better solution. Mary also pointed out that regardless of the length of the review, many people will just wait until the last week of the review before looking at it. That is the human psychology angle to it. So you might actually get more comments with a 60 day review followed by a 30 day review than you would by announcing in advance a 90 day review. Would that be acceptable to you? Send out for 60 days now, and then, a couple weeks before that expires, we can vote to extend it by x days? We'll probably have a better feel for what an appropriate value of x is at that point as well. It isn't clear to me at this point, for example, whether in 60 days we'll want to extend the review on the same PRD, or whether we'll want to make a revision in a new CD and send the revisions out for further review. It is hard to tell at this point in the game, and I think we want to keep our options open. We might also find that OpenFormula is ready for public review in 60 days and we'll be ready then to send all three parts out for simultaneous 60 day review. But if we had committed up front to a 90 review of Part 1, then we'd be facing a 30-day delay. I don't think we want to be in a position where the public review of all of ODF 1.2 cannot proceed because we're waiting for a public review of one part of ODF 1.2 to complete. Regards, -Rob From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> To: <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> Date: 12/05/2009 11:57 AM Subject: RE: [office-comment] OASIS Public Review Question I assume this went to office-comment by mistake [;<)? -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 05:32 To: Mary McRae Cc: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office-comment] OASIS Public Review Question Hi Mary, a process question for you. Is it possible to send a PRD for a 60-day review, and then based on the volume of comments, decide to extend the review for a further 30 days? Or are we required to prescient and request a 90-day comment period initially? In other words, is it possible to extend a public review once it has been issued? -Rob -- This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC. In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before posting. Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]