office message

Subject: RE: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"

From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:16:51 +0200

> And, assuming the work is desirable, who do you have in mind as a 
> more-competent body than JTC1 [SC34]? 
> 

Uh... how about IETF, which already has the DEFLATE RFC as well as other 
packaging formats like GZIP and MIME?

-Rob

References:
- SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- RE: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on DocumentPackaging"
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on DocumentPackaging"
  - From: Thorsten Behrens <tbehrens@novell.com>
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Re: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
- RE: [office] SC34 Ballot N1414 "New Work Item Proposal on Document Packaging"
  - From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>