[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] RE: Directories in Zip packages
+1 on the recommendation. I think we have the framework of an agreement about this. Needs an issue for Part 3. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: David LeBlanc [mailto:dleblanc@exchange.microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 15:55 To: Bob Jolliffe; dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: Hanssens Bart; Svante Schubert; ODF TC List Subject: RE: [office] RE: Directories in Zip packages [ ... ] Given the time constraints, I'd propose doing the following: 1) Ignore empty directories. 2) Do not make a transform that captures the directory structure of the archive, because it does not affect the appearance or content of the document. 3) In vNext, we should work on defining what must be signed in a more refined manner, paying attention to what affects content and/or appearance and what does not. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]