[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: deliverable "state of interoperability"
Hi Bart... I will be happy to participate in this process and share information. I am already working with a few members of the team here (that I believe you may have talked with) to collect some useful documents and scenarios. Specifically I will do my best to contribute as much as I am able to the third bullet point below (scenarios/documents)... It would be good if we can come up with some criteria for what is a good scenario/document; however, I have already started collecting what we have as it is probably better to have more than we need rather than not enough... Hope you are well! Cheers, -Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:29 AM To: oic-list Subject: [oic] deliverable "state of interoperability" Dear members, Per charter, we should create a "state of the interoperability" report by the first of March. My first idea was to use the whitepaper template, but as Mary pointed me out, a "specification" is currently the only sanctioned format (with another category "informational documents" on its way) so the specification template is preferred. If no-one volunteers, I'm willing to write a first working draft with - some of my own observations - references to related efforts - a few simple scenarios for creating a few test documents to highlight some issues (for example: the infamous table in table construction) (say, by the end of the month) Of course, every TC member is encouraged to contribute to this report and add or rewrite sections With those scenarios, I would like a few volunteers (vendors / developers, this could be you ;-) to - create test documents in various implementations - contribute them to the OIC TC - see what happens when opening/editing these docs in another implementation (say, by mid-Februari) Then, we can finalize the report and organize a vote to make it a "committee draft" While we won't be mentioning product names in the report, it's inevitable that we'll have some discussion along the lines of "X does foo, Y does bar" on the list. So, How does that sound ? Best regards, Bart PS: this does not mean you shouldn't be working on the analysis of the ODF package (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/oic/SpecAnalysis), it's additional homework ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]