[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
2008/6/9 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>: > > Sorry, I've been otherwise engaged today. I'll need to go back and read the > traffic from today, but it looks like we may be prematurely solving the > interoperability problem, when we really need to first agree on a charter > and then form a TC. > > Believe me, once we have a TC in place for this, we'll have an OASIS-hosted > Wiki. We'll also have mailing lists, action items trackers, document > libraries, etc. We'll have the ability to create subcommittees. We'll have > conference calls, face-to-face meetings if we want, etc. We'll have all > that infrastructure stuff available. But the way the OASIS infrastructure > is set up, this is all tied to TC membership, and until we have a TC, we > can't tap into all that. Not much point when we don't even have common terms of reference Rob. I was hoping that by sharing a document which by agreement became this groups output we could short circuit endless repeated emails. Seems not. > > I've seen some documents float around that seemed more in the nature of a > draft of one of the TC's deliverables, such as a draft or outline of a > conformity assessment document. That isn't a bad thing per se, but it is > more in the nature of a possible contribution to this TC, once created. Yes, intended as no more than that. > > If we focus on the charter task, we first note the requirements detailed in > OASIS TC Process section 2.2 <snip/> Formal deliverables. Later Rob. We're talking over each others shoulders at the moment. Now available googledocs, google site, wiki. I'm out of here till you decide how to talk. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]