Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?

["Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net>]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:

2008/6/16 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>:

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> wrote:
>
>> - In that light, I believe this TC should always be working with the most
>> recent "official" version of ODF.
>
> +1

+1, deferred perhaps until the new TC is formed (if it is).

I.e. the most recent official version at the time of the new TC formation?
Official being released by Oasis, not sanctified by OSI (I think
that's reasonable).

Agreed for the clarification of 'official' but for me it's more important that the /output/ of the TC matches the currently available version; if 1.2 arrives a day after the TC is formed it should still be considered/targeted.

Conversely a 1.2 release on the eve of the deliverables being delivered should not invalidate them. Perhaps something like:

The TC will target /at least/ the most recent official OASIS release of ODF (1.1 at the time of writing).

Sam