[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
--- On Mon, 6/23/08, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC > To: email@example.com > Date: Monday, June 23, 2008, 1:21 PM > "Dave Pawson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote > on 06/23/2008 10:17:46 AM: > > > > > Or are you suggesting that these instances would > be naturally found in > the > > > process of creating our test requirements > document, and as we search > for > > > testable provisions in the ODF standard, such > ambiguous statements > would be > > > reported, individually, to the ODF TC? > > > > > > Too easy for this to be lost in the noise. I'll > give credence to Pauls > > view here. Especially since Oasis > > has no bugzilla system to retain a log on public view. > > > > Well, maybe also give credence to your own eyes as well. > Here is a list > of all comments submitted to the ODF TC by the public. It > goes back to > 2003 and its contents are all publicly visible. > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/ > > Not as nice as bugzilla, but undeniably represents a public > log. So is this a way we may provide suggestions to the ODF TC? What is the email or what must we do? [I noticed this: email@example.com .] I assume by "public" you mean that we don't have to be any sort of OASIS member. Is there a link to the latest ODF 1.2 public draft to get an idea of their progress? Thanks.