plcs-dex message

Subject: representing_state_observed

From: Tim Turner <timturner11@bellsouth.net>
To: 'Plcs-Dex teams E-mail ' E-mail <plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:57:23 -0400

New issues on representing_state_observed:

1. This capability currently uses

ENTITY State_assessment;
  name : STRING;
  description : OPTIONAL STRING;
  assessed_state : State;
  comparable_state : State_definition;
END_ENTITY;

Hence this entity depends upon State_definition. Either this should be added
to the usage section (via the modules)  or representing_state_type (which is
where this entity is defined) should be listed as a dependant capability.

2. This capability currently uses

ENTITY State_assertion;
  name : STRING;
  description : OPTIONAL STRING;
  asserted_state : State;
  conformance_state : State_definition;
END_ENTITY;

Hence this entity depends upon State_definition. Either this should be added
to the usage section (via the modules)  or representing_state_type (which is
where this entity is defined) should be listed as a dependant capability.

regards,
Tim