OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

plcs-tog message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the TOG meeting


Mats,
 
My view is that it should be 'Data Exchange Specification'
 
Regards,
Martin.
-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 14 December 2005 08:05
To: ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk; rob.bodington@eurostep.com
Cc: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the TOG meeting

Another question: If I want to use the non-abbreviated term for 'DEX'. Should I then pronounce/write it "Data exchange set" (which for my swedish ears much sounds like file (file = a 'set' of data)) or "Data exchange specification"?

Regards - Mats

 

Martin,

Thanks for the clarification!

I'm ok with that. As long as everyone understands eachother! 'DEX' and 'DEX file' it is!

Regards,
  Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson, FMV

 


Från: Gibson, Martin [mailto:ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk]
Skickat: den 7 december 2005 11:33
Till: Nilsson, Mats maxnn
Ämne: RE: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the TOG meeting

Mats,
 
Hope you enjoyed yesterday's telecon/meeting (as much as I did!).
I'm not sure it was mentioned within the telecon, but , you are correct in your guess that the ToG Agreed that the term 'DEX' is synonymous with the term 'DEX Specification' and that a 'DEX file' is indeed that file which would be exchanged as part of a PLCS implementation.
 
Regards,
Martin.
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 06 December 2005 08:13
To: rob.bodington@eurostep.com; plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the TOG meeting

All,
 
Is the visio diagram a result of the review of the concept model draft?
 
It lacks some of the terms in the concept model (DEX file, Requirements, etc.) and it refers to 'DEX Specifications' as 'DEXs'.
I did not attend the meeting. Is this what was agreed?
 
I like the graphical layout though (except for the 'uses' arrow pointing to 'Business Reference Data' that has no source...).
Should I put it in the DEXlib information pages (new name for the help section...) and in that way prepare it for ballot?!
 
Maybe something for the meeting this afternoon?

Regards,
  Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson, FMV

 

 


Från: Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Skickat: den 6 december 2005 08:00
Till: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Kopia: Sean Barker
Ämne: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the TOG meeting

Hi

I have had several requests for a non Visio version of the diagram.

 

 

Regards
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From:
Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent:
30 November 2005 14:12
To: '
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org'
Cc:
Sean Barker (Sean.Barker@baesystems.com)
Subject: Documents from the TOG meeting

 

Hi

Here are the diagrams/spreadsheets that we developed in the TOG.

 

We went through all DEXs (apart from 5 and 9) and identified which capabilities were required. We then looked at who as editing it and whether they were funded. The spreadsheet reflects results of this.

 

We also reviewed the concept model and produced the attached Visio diagram.

 

Regards

Rob

 

-------------------------------------------   
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page:
http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]