From: Gibson, Martin
[mailto:ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
3:13 AM
To: 'mats.nilsson@fmv.se';
rob.bodington@eurostep.com
Cc: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [plcs-tog] RE:
Documents from the TOG meeting
-----Original
Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se
[mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 14 December 2005 08:05
To: ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk;
rob.bodington@eurostep.com
Cc: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE:
Documents from the TOG meeting
Another
question: If I want to use the non-abbreviated term for 'DEX'. Should I
then pronounce/write it "Data exchange set" (which for my
swedish ears much sounds like file (file = a 'set' of data)) or "Data
exchange specification"?
Regards - Mats
Martin,
Thanks for the clarification!
I'm ok with that. As long as everyone
understands eachother! 'DEX' and 'DEX file' it is!
Regards,
Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson, FMV
Från:
Gibson, Martin [mailto:ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk]
Skickat: den 7 december 2005 11:33
Till: Nilsson, Mats maxnn
Ämne: RE: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents
from the TOG meeting
Hope you enjoyed
yesterday's telecon/meeting (as much as I did!).
I'm not sure it was
mentioned within the telecon, but , you are correct in your guess that the ToG
Agreed that the term 'DEX' is synonymous with the term 'DEX Specification' and
that a 'DEX file' is indeed that file which would be exchanged as part of
a PLCS implementation.
-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se
[mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 06 December 2005 08:13
To: rob.bodington@eurostep.com; plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE:
Documents from the TOG meeting
All,
Is the visio diagram a
result of the review of the concept model draft?
It lacks some of the terms in the concept model
(DEX file, Requirements, etc.) and it refers to 'DEX Specifications' as 'DEXs'.
I did not attend the
meeting. Is this what was agreed?
I like the graphical
layout though (except for the 'uses' arrow pointing to 'Business Reference
Data' that has no source...).
Should I put it in the
DEXlib information pages (new name for the help section...) and in that way
prepare it for ballot?!
Maybe something for the
meeting this afternoon?
Regards,
Mats
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson, FMV
Från: Rob
Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Skickat: den 6 december 2005 08:00
Till:
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Kopia: Sean Barker
Ämne: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents
from the TOG meeting
Hi
I have had several
requests for a non Visio version of the diagram.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Bodington
[mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: 30 November 2005 14:12
To:
'plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org'
Cc: Sean Barker
(Sean.Barker@baesystems.com)
Subject: Documents from the TOG meeting
Hi
Here are the diagrams/spreadsheets that we developed
in the TOG.
We went through all DEXs (apart from 5 and 9) and
identified which capabilities were required. We then looked at who as editing
it and whether they were funded. The spreadsheet reflects results of this.
We also reviewed the concept model and produced the
attached Visio diagram.
Regards
Rob
-------------------------------------------
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page: http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401