Re: [regrep-comresolve] Some other V2 Spec comments

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

OK how about 1-2pm Eastern on Monday 3/18/2002. Are we all OK with that?

Unless I hear otherwise I will send logistics soon.

"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> Thanks for your help.  My travel requirements are quite high next week.
>
> On Monday 18 March I am free very early am or from 11am through 2pm EST but
> unfortunately I am booked solid after that until 5pm EST.  I am also free
> from 5-6pm EST on Monday.
>
> I am traveling Tuesday but can do a very early morning call on Tuesday or a
> 6pm EST call on Tuesday.  Wednesday through Friday are out all together.
>
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: Munter, Joel D
> Cc: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution'
> Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Some other V2 Spec comments
>
> Thanks Joel for compiling the links.
>
> I will take a first stab at converting these to issues by COB tomorrow and
> send
> the result to the list.
> I think you are right that we should have a meeting to discuss the issue
> list.
>
> How is 2-3pm Eastern on Monday for sub-team members?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> "Munter, Joel D" wrote:
>
> > Farrukh,
> >
> > There are at least two links to my specific comments:
> >
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200112/msg00039.html
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200203/msg00003.html
> >
> > Please note, some of these were addressed in the approved V2 specs.  For
> > instance the line number issue was successfully dealt with already. The
> > comment discussing several dangling references may or may not have been
> > addressed.  Lets discuss the rest.
> >
> > Here is a link to Duane's original post:
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200202/msg00066.html
> >
> > A link to Nita comments is:
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200202/msg00014.html
> >
> > My WSDL issues note is:
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200203/msg00017.html
> >
> > I will send another note with links to the other relevant V2 issues asap.
> I
> > simply have run out of time and need to get to a meeting.
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:59 AM
> > To: Munter, Joel D
> > Cc: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution'; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org;
> > Breininger, Kathryn R
> > Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Some other V2 Spec comments
> >
> > Joel,
> >
> > Please recall that the decision of the team in the last meeting was to
> > accept
> > any past comments from *you* that you re-submit
> > or send pointers to as formal comments. It was not a blanket YES to
> sifting
> > through all past email looking for
> > any question about the specs.
> >
> > This process is getting out of hand and creates unnecessary confusion. I
> > think
> > that we should only accept formal comments on a formal alias.
> > Otherwise we will be arguing over what is a formal comment or not.
> >
> > Kathryn, is there already a formal email alias for submitting external
> > comments?
> > If not then we can ignore my
> > suggestion above.
> >
> > As to your comments that you feel are being ignored, could you please send
> a
> > link to the precise set of comments you would like to formally
> > submit as external comments. Kathryn, I would like to suggest that we
> > dedicate
> > our next meeting to addressing Joel's comments.
> >
> > As for yet another meeting prposal, I propose for conducting issue
> > resolution by
> > email with each issue being assigned a number and initiated
> > in a separate thread by me (as the team's issue keeper). If anyone else
> > would
> > like to be the issue keeper I will be glad to hand over that
> responsibility.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Farrukh
> >
> > "Munter, Joel D" wrote:
> >
> > > To date, within his MS Access database approach, Farrukh has captured a
> > > single but vital comment from Duane Nickell about the V2 registry model
> > > being a potential bottleneck and that there is a potential for DoS
> > attacks,
> > > and my two recent comments related to the normative V2 WSDL files
> > affiliated
> > > with the RAWS approach.  Duane has submitted both issues within a single
> > > thread but for better visibility I believe that we should break them out
> > > into two.
> > >
> > > There are other comments which have come in during the formal review
> > period
> > > that have not yet been captured.  Farrukh and/or others may have
> provided
> > > first level response to some of these, but I believe it is important
> that
> > we
> > > discuss and agree with the disposition of these comments.
> > >
> > > Also, while the trivial ones have been addressed, I will again remind
> all
> > > that my own comments about the V2 spec continue to go ignored.
> > >
> > > Kit Ko, 7 March 2002,
> > > In "sec 6.6.2.2 Communication Bootstrapping for ebXML message
> > > Service", I think all this section is only applied to a "thin client"
> (as
> > > defined in sec 6.6.1).
> > > Am I right?!
> > >
> > > Kim Chaemee, 18 December 2001,
> > > (1) In Figure 6, there is no "Updated" status in lifecycle. Is it right
> or
> > > missed?
> > > (2) In 8.4.2. GetContentResponse Message Structure, Is it
> > > GetContentResponseMessage? In message fragment, there is
> > <GetContentRequest>
> > > instead of Response.
> > > (3) In 9.7. Access Control, there is only 3 role as Content owner,
> > registry
> > > administrator, registry guest.  However, there is no consistency between
> > > 5.3. Registry Users, Table1. Actors and Table11. Role. I think it's
> better
> > > to have some consistency to describe the role of actors.
> > > (4) Do you have a plan not to provide RIM DTD anymore? From Developer's
> > > perspective, sometimes we need DTD instead of Schema.  Some XML Binding
> SW
> > > doesn't provide Schema yet.
> > > (5) Content based query in SQL Query.  Is there specific request &
> > response
> > > for content based query in SQL Query?
> > >
> > > Kyu-Chul Lee, 9 January 2002,
> > > I'd like to ask that the OASIS ebXML Registry V2.0 is backward
> compatible
> > > with V1.0 or not.
> > > There are already many implementations of ebXML Registry V1.0.
> > > I think it is required to guarantee the backward compatibility in order
> to
> > > save their investments.
> > >
> > > Nita Sharma, 11 February 2002,
> > > We(the ebXML BP Catalog team) had a long conversation last week with
> > Kathryn
> > > about unique identification and what their scheme should be. We provided
> > her
> > > with our requirements for unique identification that was not satisfied
> by
> > > the current UUID specification of regrep. The various things that we
> > touched
> > > base upon were:
> > >
> > > 1. Meaningful verses meaningless identification scheme
> > > 2. multiple identification scheme for the same item based on various
> > usages.
> > > 3. A standard organization (like UCC/EAN) to control the uniqueness and
> > > meaningfulness
> > > 4. Separate namespace for the various identification schemes
> > > 5. Analyze other schemes like IDEF, OID etc.
> > >
> > > And finally, when can we all meet to assign tasks and review the status
> of
> > > each of these issues/comments.  I propose either Friday 15 March 3-4pm
> MST
> > > (5-6pm EST) or Monday 18 March 9-10am MST (11-12pm EST).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Joel Munter
> > > Distributed Systems, Intel Labs
> > > joel.d.munter@intel.com
> > > (480) 552-3076
> > > (602) 790-0924 (cell)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

--
Regards,
Farrukh