Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Oops - I take that back. I was thinking about what my firm pays vs.
individual. I think a better answer might have been that this is the
whole idea behind "invited experts" - that they don't have to be OASIS
members to contribute.

Joe

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
> 
> Zachary Alexander wrote:
> >
> > Farrukh,
> >
> > Why not have them join OASIS and the Reg/Rep TC? Individual membership
> > is a special class of OASIS membership setup for industry experts.
> >
> > Zachary Alexander
> > The IT Investment Architect
> > ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
> > http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com
> > http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:39 PM
> > To: Zachary Alexander
> > Cc: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
> >
> > Zachary Alexander wrote:
> >
> > >Farrukh,
> > >
> > >Does this mean the ebXML Registry SCM standard will no longer be an
> > >OASIS standard? Shouldn't this be put to a vote to the Reg/Rep TC?
> > >
> > Nothing changes other than the location and visibility of the documents.
> >
> > >Isn't
> > >this the same as saying that anyone can participate in the development
> > >of the OASIS Registry SCM standard regardless of membership in OASIS?
> > >
> > >
> > No not anyone. Only invited experts in SW community that we would be
> > liaisoning with.
> >
> > This is purely logistical move. It has no deeper meaning or intent.
> >
> > >Zachary Alexander
> > >The IT Investment Architect
> > >ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
> > >http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com
> > >http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> > >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:17 AM
> > >To: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org
> > >Subject: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
> > >
> > >
> > >Team,
> > >
> > >We are moving the use case and scenario documents from KAVI to an
> > >external web site for the following reasons:
> > >
> > >-We need to share use cases with Semantic Web community at large
> > outside
> > >
> > >OASIS to get broad feedback.
> > >KAVI does not seem to allow that.
> > >
> > >-We need the URLs to our document tree to be user-defined (us). Notice
> > >how much more memorable they
> > >are in the new location.
> > >
> > >The new location for the use cases and scenarios documents is:
> > >
> > >http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/ebxmlrr-spec/scmsc/useCases
> > >
> > >The content is identical to what was last in KAVI except that I have
> > >changed the names of some files.
> > >
> > >You may soon see messages about deletion of KAVI version of these
> > files.
> > >
> > >Just ignore them.
> > >
> > >Recall that in our last meeting we had covered user cases 3, 4 and 5.
> > >
> > >For our next meeting on Tues 2/24 at 1PM I propose we resume with
> > >discussion of use cases in the following order:
> > >
> > >5-9, 1, 2
> > >
> > >Until then please study the use cases and share comments. Also feel
> > free
> > >
> > >to submit new use cases and scenarios using the template established
> > for
> > >
> > >the group. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Farrukh