[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] Content-based Discovery v0.3
I think that it is more an issue of scalability. Not having a relavancy attribute when there are ten (10) entries in an ebXML registry is different than not having a relavancy attribute when there are 10 million entries. Of what use is a 40k result set. If I search for seller in an ebXML registry that has 10 thousand entries and I get a result set with 300 entries what I do next? I may have miss read the standard. If anyone can submit an index then wouldn't there be value in encoding your choice of hot links. From a p2p standpoint, is there any value in trading result sets. zack -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber - XMLGlobal [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:01 PM To: INTERNET:zack2@cris.com Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org; Farrukh Najmi Subject: RE: [regrep] Content-based Discovery v0.3 Zack, This has come up before. Relevancy is a subjective measure, and it seems better that such algorithms be external to the main registry specification - that can be applied post-retreival. However - we did discuss before a 'frequency tracking' measure that would say they often a piece of content had been accessed, and last accessed date/time. Again this may or may not provide useful information since some content may occur in query results becuase of some very common word in the name or description. How critical this is right now could be debated. IMHO we may want to wait off until we have larger sets of content we can use to determine how effective such strategies may be. DW. ===================================================== Message text written by INTERNET:zack2@cris.com > Farrukh, Is it possible to embed relevancy attributes in Content-Based Discovery? I was thinking that maybe a user would want to check multiple registries and analyze the results. So registry 1 may say that an entry is 95% and registry 2 may say that the entry is 40%. This would mean that the attributes would be transient. 2nd would it be possible to embed a "pitch" in the entry and evaluate the "pitch." zack< ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC