regrep message

Subject: Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts

From: Matthew MacKenzie <matt@mac-kenzie.net>
To: OASIS Registry List <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:57:29 -0800


Correction.  s/compount/compound/

Matthew MacKenzie wrote:

> I think the best approach would be to define a generic XML structure 
> to house the component, with some sort of indication saying "this core 
> component is  atomic", or "this core component is a compount 
> component, made up of | derived from |etc ...".

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

References:
- Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts
  - From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>
- Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts
  - From: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts
  - From: Matthew MacKenzie <matt@mac-kenzie.net>