XQuery Support (Was Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry -further thoughts)

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

> Functionally everything still works - anyone can query against
> the CAM template XML to discover all the relationships -
> by exploiting the mechanisms inside the template itself.

Perhaps we should look toward possibly supporting XQuery/XPath Full-Text
Search in V4 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlquery-full-text-requirements/)?
Depending on the timing/progress of the Working Draft, of course.

- Joe


David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Message text written by Chiusano Joseph
> >
> MY QUESTION:  Wouldn't we most like represent the Association Core
> Component (Person.Residence.Address) as we would represent any Aggregate
> Core Component, but with an association of "Inherits From" (a new
> assocationType) - that is, Residence.Address would inherit from
> Address.Details?
> <<<<<<<<<<
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I believe this approach is fraught with lots of "gotchas" - especially
> supporting business context structure changes.
> 
> That's why I see that the separation of the assembly associations
> into the CAM template great simplifies all this.
> 
> Functionally everything still works - anyone can query against
> the CAM template XML to discover all the relationships -
> by exploiting the mechanisms inside the template itself.
> 
> But - you are not therefore attempting to use the registry to
> handle assembly, schema fragments and much more.
> 
> Of course you can still add regular registry associations
> from the CAM template entries to other entries in the
> registry - but attempting to use these as the means to
> represent all the subtly of assembly and context - is
> not optimal.
> 
> Cheers, DW.

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano