[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Core Components - Revisited
Thanks Nikola - that clears it up. Regarding: <Quote> Are we talking about the "context" here? Is that one of the Things that the subteam "should" model? </Quote> We are talking about the metadata representations for this verification test, rather than the context. The context (Geopolitical context, Business Process context, etc.) could be handled separately - perhaps by the CAM TC? David W.? Joe Nikola wrote: > > <Joe> > For [1], you wrote: > > <Quote1> > [1] CCTS abstract model -> RIM > > This is what I think Joe is referring to as "RIM binding". I'd say this > could be sufficient. Subteam certainly shouldn't attempt this: > </Quote1> > > Did you mean to say "Subteam certainly SHOULD attempt this"? You also > wrote "shouldn't" for [2], so I thought that at least one of the these > should be "should" (pardon the tricky English!) > </Joe> > > "I'd say this" -> "this" refersTo [1]. I used sufficient, because I thought > "should" is not in question "here"; yes, "Subteam certainly SHOULD attempt > this". > > "shouldn't attempt this:" -> "this:" refersTo [2]. > > Are we talking about the "context" here? Is that one of the Things that the > subteam "should" model? > > Cheers, > Nikola
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]