[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?
Another way to interpret all of this: UDDI does not by nature store items, it points to them. Joe Duane Nickull wrote: > > To comment further on this matter, UDDI specifications define an > interface, not a complete specification for a registry. The granddaddy > of all reg-rep specs is ISO/EIC 11179. This defines the inner > functional requirements for a metadata facility without constraining a > specific interface or implementation. Issues of administration, > extensibility, ad-hoc, user defined assocaitions, extensible user > defined classifications are all addressed. > > ebXML , IMHO, implements most of 11179 by providing a clear and > extensible RIM (registry Information Model) as well as defining an > interface and bindings (RSS). UDDI only facilitates the interface and > bindings and leaves the implementors clear to choose the best way to > implement the inner RIM. > > It is possible that a Registry could use the ebXML RIM and implement > both UDDI and ebXML interfaces and bindings. > > Duane Nickull > > -- > > *************************************************** > Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com > Web Services & ebXML Messaging / Registry Downloads > Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture > Phone: +1 (604) 738-1051 - Canada: Pacific Standard Time > Direct: +1 (604) 726-3329
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]