[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] RELAX NG 2.0 ideas
> I suppose that RELAX NG 2.0 is a long-term goal. Yes, I think so. I don't expect RELAX NG 2.0 to contain more than a small percentage of the ideas that have been and will be suggested. The hard part will be to make the right choices. I think we still need much more real world experience before we can do this. > However, it might make > sense to introduce some small fixes before RELAX NG becomes an > International Standard. I think there is scope for a 1.0 2nd edition or 1.0.1 that doesn't change the namespace URI and doesn't add any new syntax, but merely incorporates errata, clarifies things, and makes changes of the "arguably an erratum" type, such as >> 10. A better restriction on <interleave> (issue 40); the current one >> forbids some useful things and >> An infinite-nameclass <attribute> is required to have <text/> >> as its content. For anything that adds new features, I'm less sure. My guess is that everybody could pick just one little extra feature they would like to add in 1.1, but that we would each pick something different. James
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC