Stavros,
1. Since you are so good at aesthetics (I am not), would you be
interested in stripping out the OCCI material in the OCCI slidedeck and
reapplying the OASIS template, thus creating a WD 01 document. We should work
off of that version to ultimately get an approved CD as soon as possible, IMHO.
A WD will get us all started. Does this make sense?
2. Also, although I won’t be there, I would like to suggest that
the charter revision that I wrote up also be put on Thursday agenda. The reason
is that we need some explanation in the charter as to why Cloud is there. Furthermore,
an improved charter, FAQ, and a good slide deck with 1-2 cloud and energy use
cases would be just what we need to start evangelizing this TC more
effectively. I think this is extremely important.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul Lipton
VP, Industry Standards and Open Source
Member, CA Council for Technical Excellence
Phone (preferred number!): +1 215 539-2731
Mobile: +1 267 987-6887
Email: paul.lipton@ca.com
THIS MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL, PRIVILEGED OR OTHER LEGALLY
PROTECTED INFORMATION. IT IS INTENDED FOR THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. IF YOU ARE NOT
THE ADDRESSEE (OR SOMEONE THE ADDRESSEE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE),
YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM COPYING, DISTRIBUTING OR OTHERWISE USING IT. PLEASE
NOTIFY THE SENDER AND RETURN IT AT OUR COST. THANK YOU.
From: David Snelling
[mailto:David.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:02 AM
To: Lipton, Paul C
Cc: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com; saf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck
+1
On 16 Mar 2010, at 13:31, Lipton, Paul C wrote:
OCCI was only one purpose, IMHO. We need a
committee approved general version asap, too.
Thanks,
Paul (from mobile)
----- Original Message -----
From: Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com
<Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: saf@lists.oasis-open.org <saf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tue Mar 16 05:10:15 2010
Subject: [saf] More on FAQ and slidedeck
Following my last email, we should finalize, motion, and vote on the FAQ on
Thursday to accept it as a Committee Draft (Full Majority Vote -i.e. more than
50% of the voting members).
I am not sure if we should do the same with the slidedeck at this point as it
is focused on OCCi interactions. If we generalize it for educational purposes
then we should vote on it as well.
Thoughts?
Stavros
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK .
Fujitsu . com >
Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
Hayes Park Central
Hayes End Road
Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
Reg. No. 4153469
+44-7590-293439 (Mobile)
|
______________________________________________________________________ |